Organisation with active employee engagement - Associate Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

5.0
Aug 25, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Capgemini provides employees with various development programs to help them grow professionally and advance within the company. In Capgemini employees attend internal networking events, expanding their professional connections. Capgemini is good for work-life balance. Good company culture in Capgemini, which emphasizes fun, employee happiness.

Cons

A junior/fresher employee might have limited influence over project decisions and must follow established processes and guidelines which they are not aware of. A new graduate working as a Associate at Capgemini may face a long wait for promotions or advancements due to a slow-moving hierarchy. If management does not clearly communicate company objectives, employees might work on projects that do not align with the career goals, wasting time and resources. A graduate with a degree in Computer science might struggle to find relevant entry-level positions in a capgemini. If you are good at technical domain then too you'll be asked to work in an non-technical domain. No importance given to A3 grades.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All