Capgemini Invent reviews

3.6

67% would recommend to a friend

(3,550 total reviews)
avatar

Roshan Soorunsingh Gya

75% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

Capgemini Invent has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 3,550 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Capgemini Invent employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Beratung industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
1.0
Mar 3, 2026

Avoid!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Flexibility & WFH - Some good benefits - Made some good friends (bonding over difficult projects)

Cons

- No growth or skill development: You rarely get work aligned to your experience or interests. In the time I was here, I have gone backwards, not forwards. There has been no exposure to relevant, meaningful, or challenging work. I have done nothing aligned with my experience or ambitions. I no longer have any relevant skills for what I want to do, as I haven't used them in so long. Surprising that a Data consultant does not even see data once. I did not grow technically or professionally. I am way less competitive in the job market now than when I joined. - Interview promises were straight-up lies: I was very clear about my ambitions and asked thorough questions before joining. I was promised relevant work, development, and a clear growth path. None of that happened. I was told that I could plan my career, see upcoming projects, and work on things aligned with my goals, but this was all a lie; no such platform or process exists. None of it happened. You’re constantly strung along with vague feedback and “next time” conversations while decisions are already made behind closed doors or long before the actual discussions happen. There are limited progression opportunities, there is always a new reason or new expectations every round and information is hidden from you to make you unprepared. - Sweatshop-style culture and excessive internal work with no impact: You're just a resource, you get asked to work long hours, late nights, weekends and don't even get a thank you, let alone any other meaningful recognition or compensation. Every project I worked on, I was put under a lot of pressure and put in a lot of work, and was still treated very rudely. You're expected to juggle demanding client work, internal initiatives, and HR-type tasks. Much of this work goes absolutely nowhere and adds unnecessary pressure. Everyone is stretched across too many responsibilities. People don’t respond because they also genuinely don’t have the capacity. - Damaging to health and confidence: The environment contributes to burnout and long-term health issues. I have developed such horrible health issues that I’m still dealing with the impact long after. You feel demoralised, less confident, and professionally stagnant. I feel like I've wasted years of my career. I was so, so, so miserable. I wasn't myself anymore, and everyone around me noticed. I regret joining this company, I wish I never did. - Project allocation is completely broken and biased: there is no transparent resourcing system or visibility of available roles. You must message managers/seniors (like crazy, not a simple/straightforward experience) to find work. This allows favouritism and bias, with roles quietly reserved for preferred individuals. I've had roles hidden from me and being 'forced' into other roles for one's own gain. - No opportunity to stretch or lead: You are often limited to admin or note-taking. Chances to lead meetings, interviews, or initiatives are rare. Growth is discussed but not actually enabled. I had a lot more ownership and opportunities to learn and grow at my entry-level job than here. Even when you shout from the roof about your abilities and that you are willing to and can do more, they don't care. I was objectively capable and super proactive and loud, and I still didn't get any opportunities (even basic ones). - Leadership does not care about you (not even at a human level), they are performative, and there is a serious lack of basic people-management skills: Senior leadership is largely inaccessible, they barely make time for you, and directors are too busy even for 10 minutes. A lot of recent interactions have been dismissive, uninterested or straight-up rude. Forget caring about you personally, they don't even do the professional bare minimum. Senior leaders frequently speak about inclusion and accepting differences, but in practice, people are penalised for personality traits such as being introverted or a bit quiet, even when you lead sessions, present regularly, deliver results, work seriously over time, carry the brunt of the work and are great with clients. There is a clear disconnect between their messaging and behaviour. Plus, many managers seriously lack basic people-management skills, emotionally and professionally. - EVERYTHING is highly political (nothing like I've seen before): promotions, opportunities, recognition, even internal team awards are based on who leadership likes. Performance and results matter less than visibility and personal relationships. It doesn't matter if you do good work or if your client and client team are happy with you. All that matters is "visibility." If you’re not “chummy chummy” with the right people, good luck. - Misconduct and unfair treatment are not addressed: When serious issues are raised, little to no action is taken. Accountability is weak or non-existent.

2.0
Feb 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It is difficult to identify many positives from my overall experience. However, there was one project where I worked with a strong team and a genuinely positive culture. The work was engaging, collaborative, and development-focused. On that project, I felt challenged in a productive way and was able to build meaningful skills. It demonstrated that with the right leadership and environment, the experience could be rewarding.

Cons

My experience within the Analytics & AI function did not provide the technical growth I had expected. As a graduate, I joined with the intention of developing my data analytics and AI capabilities, but I did not receive structured training or meaningful hands-on exposure to build those skills. The first time I encountered practical SQL content was through a basic internal slide deck, rather than through guided project experience or formal development. Role clarity was also a significant issue. I was staffed as a Data Analytics and Reporting Lead, but the responsibilities did not reflect that title. The role largely became reactive client support work, often involving late evenings responding to ad-hoc requests. When concerns were raised with project leadership, they were not initially handled constructively, which led to escalation through internal channels. While HR was supportive, the situation highlighted inconsistencies in how wellbeing and role expectations were managed. Recognition and progression processes felt misaligned. Despite strong performance feedback on projects and consistent delivery, visibility appeared to carry more weight than output. Those who were more vocal or heavily involved in internal initiatives seemed to gain greater recognition, regardless of project performance. As a result, I often felt undervalued despite working hard and receiving positive project-level feedback. There also appears to be a disconnect between project contribution and promotion criteria. Individuals are primarily assessed on billable project performance day-to-day, yet advancement depends significantly on internal contributions. This created pressure to engage in internal work largely to satisfy promotion requirements, rather than because it added meaningful value. Finally, professional development within the function felt overly dependent on informal, on-the-job learning. In a specialist area such as Analytics & AI, a clearer development pathway with structured technical training would significantly improve the experience for graduates and early-career professionals.

3.0
Feb 4, 2026

Feels like a sinking ship

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some genuinely great people to work with. Some degree of flexibility over working hours/patterns but very dependant on area and decision makers.

Cons

Bi-annual promotion opportunities are a myth with promotion by exception only. No annual pay increase, not even in line with cost of living/inflation. Some of the work is interesting but lots of consultants get stuck in projects for 2+ years. Huge culture change especially after big changes in senior leadership, what did feel like a big family now feels rotten in some areas. Promotion is a battlefield, you can tick all the boxes and get amazing feedback and still ‘lose out’ on promotion to someone who simply speaks louder than you.

Viewing 100 - 102 of 3,550 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,588 Capgemini Invent reviews submitted anonymously by Capgemini Invent employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Capgemini Invent is right for you.