Applied Materials reviews

3.9

78% would recommend to a friend

(4,561 total reviews)
avatar

Gary Dickerson

86% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Applied Materials has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 4,561 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Applied Materials employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Produktion industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

5K reviews
1.0
Nov 11, 2017

Applies only to DSM aka dep group

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good coworkers Getting fit standing on metal floors for 10 hours at stretch and carrying heavy parts from one building to another after doing a Masters or PhD

Cons

Highly political organization with an attrition rate of 30 percent /will provide counter offers and then not keep promises / h1b and green card holders should avoid this division /most of the work can be done by a high school student but they hire mostly Masters and PhDS/ work is long but mundane and super easy basically you are a glorified technician/you will essentially learn nothing outside the niche area/have now started giving promotions to all and sundry in an effort to keep the few remaining people with three years experience

3.0
Jan 25, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people and products. Global leader.

Cons

Constant focus on reducing costs has cost the company a lot. People are treated like expenses and not like assets. Constant layoffs

1.0
May 31, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This job = product engineer + quality engineer (SQE + CQE + NPI quality) + reliability engineer + TPM

Cons

The Quality & Reliability (Q&R) organization has a high concentration of Indian managers. Employee turnover rates are very high, with several people leaving teams every year and few "US persons" left. There are safety concerns about retaliation from managers if negative feedback is provided to HR. During interview processes, candidates may not get to interact with current team members to get a sense of the group culture. The role involves collaborating with process engineering teams on product development programs (PDP). However, due to high turnover on those teams, it can be difficult to obtain needed data and analysis support. There are complaints that in meetings, the management team consisting of the VP, directors, and managers ask overly details unrelated to the Q&R role, which most view as demeaning and demanding. Requests for assistance from leadership are sometimes met with being redirected elsewhere rather than direct support. Workloads can be very high, with some engineers handling 30-100 emails per day in addition to being assigned multiple programs across time zones, resulting in very long work hours (7 am -11 pm). There are perceptions that managers do not provide adequate resources yet criticize subordinates' time & project management and technical abilities. Some view certain managers as excelling more at political maneuvering than providing clear leadership functions and value. Overall, the work environment and management culture in this Q&R organization are perceived negatively by employees. High turnover, heavy workloads, retaliation, and performance criticism from managers are common experiences reported.

Viewing 43 - 45 of 4,561 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,376 Applied Materials reviews submitted anonymously by Applied Materials employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Applied Materials is right for you.